NeuroTraderInstitutional
Portfolio · State Engine

Liquidity

How quickly the portfolio can actually act
DEMO DATA
What changed

Cash stands at 12.6% against a 10.0% policy minimum, with 52.6% of the portfolio settling within one business day.

Why it matters

Stressed settlement capacity plus $6.2M of private capital calls set the real ceiling on near-term action.

Watch / decide

Stressed coverage of 34 days remains above the 20-day floor, but alternatives are gated in that scenario.

Data health 98%

Normal vs stressed liquidity

Normal · liquid
89.8%
Stressed · liquid
79.5%
Immediate · Same day12.6% → 12.6%
T+1 · 1 business day40.0% → 36.8%
T+2 · 2 business days26.9% → 23.1%
T+5 · Up to 5 days10.3% → 7.0%
Illiquid · Lock-up / gated10.2% → 0.0%
NormalStressed
Drill into holdings
Cash
12.6%
Normalminimum 10.0%
Headroom over minimum
2.6pp
$6.5M
Settles within a week
79.5%
Immediate through T+2
Illiquid
10.2%
Private equity, real assets, hedge
Immediate · T+1 · T+2 · T+5 · Illiquid

Settlement Ladder

Settlement capacity by horizon
Immediate
Same day
12.6%
cum. 12.6%
T+1
1 business day
40.0%
cum. 52.6%
T+2
2 business days
26.9%
cum. 79.5%
T+5
Up to 5 days
10.3%
cum. 89.8%
Illiquid
Lock-up / gated
10.2%
cum. 100.0%
Cash
12.6%
Policy minimum 10.0%
Within one day
52.6%
Cash plus T+1 settlement
Illiquid
10.2%
$25.4M
Stressed coverage
34 days
Floor 20 days
Where action would be funded from

Funding Sources

Cash reserve
T-bills and institutional money market
12.6%
Same-week equity sales
US equity and digital assets, T+1
40.0%
Settlement within a week
International equity, Treasuries, TIPS
26.9%
From the Analytics Library

Liquidity analytics

Days-to-liquidate distribution

Canonical demo data

Cumulative share of the portfolio that can be liquidated by each horizon, normal and stressed.

2.11%56.3%110.5%Same day1 business day2 business daysUp to 5 daysLock-up / gated100.0%79.5%
NormalStressed

ReadingStressed: 72.5% liquid within the first three tiers. Shows how long it would take to fund a large redemption or rebalance under stress.

Liquidity vs concentration matrix

Canonical demo data

Position weight against liquidity tier for the largest holdings.

Liquidity tier (1 = immediate · 5 = illiquid)Weight %XLK / directLadder 2–10y0–6m billsLQDXLVXLF3 fund commitmentsEUFNInstitutional MMFEXIXLIDirect + REIT

ReadingThe largest positions are in fast tiers — concentration is fixable without forced selling. Large positions in slow tiers are the hardest to fix quickly.