NeuroTraderInstitutional
Governance

Decision History

Recommendation, judgment and consequence — eight decisions since November 2025
DEMO DATA
What changed

Eight decisions have been reviewed since November 2025, and the record now shows where human judgment improved on the research and where it did not.

Why it matters

Five decisions produced the modelled effect, two produced part of it, and one deferral doubled the exposure it was meant to reduce.

Watch / decide

The August technology deferral set a review trigger that fired on Sep 26 and was never actioned — the same decision is open again at a higher tax cost.

Decisions on record

Expected effect measured against observed effect

Decision Quality

Since Nov 2025
Decisions reviewed
8
Effect as modelled
5
2 partial
Adverse outcome
1
One deferral
Avg model confidence
84%

Five of eight decisions produced the modelled effect. Two produced part of it. One deferral materially worsened the position it was meant to address. Two recorded decisions were deliberate inaction and both were correct.

Human dispositions
Approved
5
Approved as modified
1
Deferred
1
Rejected
1
Deliberate holds, both correct
2
Select any decision to open its full review

Decision Record

8 decisions
DateDecisionRecommendationHuman decisionExpected effectObserved effectConf.Owner